One Instance Where the Buyer Truly Does Pay All Real Estate Commissions
Last week I submitted an offer on a short sale on behalf of one of my clients. In absolute terms the offer would not be a short sale - at least not if there were no escrow fees, no commissions, no attorneys fees for the foreclosure paperwork that already has begun. With all of that included, however, a short sale it would be if ultimately accepted by the bank.
One option I’ve been mulling is whether to suggest to my client that they raise their offer price so it’s no longer a short sale. To do so, however, would involve my client paying the commission for both me and the listing agent; the seller’s not seeing a dime and the bank would not be dipping into their proceeds.
This may be the exception that proves the rule for some; to my mind, given very narrow strictures where the seller is netting zero regardless of offer price and where the bank is not losing any of their cash, the buyer would be paying everything.
(As an aside, the main reason I haven’t made the suggestion is we were the second offer in the door … a distinction irrelevant to the person at the bank considering the offers but of note given the backup position in the real estate “real world.”)
Technorati Tags: Phoenix real estate, real estate commissions, short sales, foreclosures
Popularity: 7% [?]







