Failing the Homeowner
Posted on August 10th, 2007 by Jonathan Dalton
It happens like clockwork. A seller calls trying to figure out why traffic through their home has been slower than they anticipated (largely because their friends and relatives have told them there should be two showings a day.) Within a day, I receive a call from an agent who wants to show the home.
The reason for this, as I explained, is we real estate agents have a secret signal we send out after a seller has called demanding showings. Rather than the shape of a bat, a big “R” from the Realtor trademark flashes across the sky and we instinctively know one our kind is in need. Works every time.
Lack of showings usually concern me less than they do the homeowner because I know what to expect in any given market. Back in 2005, if the phone didn’t ring within the first hour and if I didn’t have an offer before sundown, something was wrong. Not so in this market, though well-priced homes still receive multiple offers from time to time.
I try my best to bridge the disconnect between seller expectations and market reality. I talk about what to expect in terms of showings, which homes are selling, what needed to happen for those homes to sell. But the message seems to get lost from time to time.
And, in truth, I’ve allowed it to happen. Twice recently when a seller asked if “we could try” listing their home at a higher-than-recommended price, I said yes with a caveat - I wrote an automatic price reduction into the listing agreement.
Truth be told, that wasn’t a firm enough stand. My answer should have been no. And if it cost me the listing, so be it.
Why did I bend? Not to plant a sign in the yard and pick up the alleged ancillary business from sign calls and the like. Not to harvest buyers who come through open houses with no plans of actually purchasing the home being held open. No, I bent because I believed I had set expectations properly, as signified by the automatic price reduction.
“If you want to try it fine,” I would say. “But if we don’t have any offers in two weeks, we are going to drop the price.”
My sellers would nod and agree. I only learned later they were looking at that original price and despite everything I was saying still were convinced a miracle could occur. In my mind, writing the price reduction into the contract was better than what could happen if they ran into an agent ready to list at all costs and at any list price with no regard for reality. They’re out there. In numbers. Say what you need to say, set false hopes, then pound the seller for price reductions later down the line.
Looking back, my strategy was in error because sellers still expect buyers to look at their home regardless of list price. Even knowing they have priced their home too high, they assume someone will come in with a lowball offer - not understanding that the buyers writing lowball offers are doing so on homes already priced thousands lower. Why try and move a seller $50,000 when you can move a lower-priced seller $25,000 and pay the same price?
“No” often is the most difficult word to say in real estate, especially when you know there always is someone around to say yes. You try your best to educate and you hope that the message gets through.
But more and more, it seems like “no” is the only realistic answer. If sellers don’t believe the numbers, let them choose someone else at their own peril. It happens. Take it from someone who twice has watched listings expire only to see the new agent come in and immediately raise the list price.
Do I need to tell you how that story ends?
Popularity: 4% [?]





Good advice and well put Dalton. Hard to walk from a listing, but when the numbers are obvious and the seller just can’t see it as the agent does, it’s better to let someone else provide the (dis)service.
Do something you like to do-
To paraphrase Russell Shaw- Take an overpriced listing or watch Premier League? They both pay the same.
There’s an occasional override on common sense, particularly on corporate relo files.